Sooner Be Blue

Mostly politics, a few current events, a squirt of seltzer down yer pants .. a little blog for my rambles and rants.

2008/6/21

It's a family tradition!

Tags:
@ 09:16 AM (2 months, 8 days ago)


Dang, I hate it when the crooks are Democrats!

Read the rest of this entry ... (249 words left)

2008/6/18

A billion dollar cough

Tags:
@ 06:30 PM (2 months, 11 days ago)

 

Another US military contractor overbilling scandal in Iraq. Ah well, you fight a war with the corrupt, criminal thugs you have, not the ones  you wish you had.

If there's one thing we've learned about the Bush administration and Iraq, it's don't mess with Dick Cheney's corporate buddies at Halliburton and KBR. If you do, you end up like this poor guy, a former Army contract official who had the nerve to question $1 billion dollars worth of questionable charges by KBR back in 2004.

From the New York Times:
"Army Overseer Tells of Ouster Over KBR Stir
By JAMES RISEN Published: June 17, 2008
WASHINGTON — The Army official who managed the Pentagon’s largest contract in Iraq says he was ousted from his job when he refused to approve paying more than $1 billion in questionable charges to KBR, the Houston-based company that has provided food, housing and other services to American troops.

.....He is giving his account just as the Pentagon has recently awarded KBR part of a 10-year, $150 billion contract in Iraq. [..]"

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/washington/17contractor.html

Ain't this something! A private firm holds our troops hostage by threatening to cut off food, water and services, and DoD can't find anything else to do but pay the ransom?

This is even more scandalous than simple corruption, obviously KBR has "good connections". It means that we have outsourced absolutely critical functions to private companies, companies which, unlike military personnel, can threaten to stop doing their jobs without facing courts-martial.

Shouldn't it be considered a threat to national security to have our military so completely dependent on a single private corporation? Because how "secure" is a nation who is this dependent on civilian contractors?

Once upon a time our military provided their own "food, fuel, and potable water along with critical services ranging from complex engineering to cleaning out the port-o-potties."

Just another reason to end the war. We are being blackmailed, hijacked, and ransomed by our own greedy corporate giants.

You know, war profiteering used to be taboo...not so much anymore. Can you recall any sitting Vice president, who kept a financial interest in the companies he formerly controlled as CEO, ever having such an influence over how government contracts were awarded and managed for the benefit of his friends?

And has any White House in history ever done more to cover up the corruption and outright theft of public funds?

Hopefully, President Obama will have investigations into the fraud and abuse which occurred during the Bush years. Not only has abuse, corruption and cronyism been rampant, KBR knows it's playing with a stacked deck, in a rigged game...they can do anything they damn well please, because without them, the army's between Iraq and a hard place.

 

2008/2/21

Bimbo alert!

Tags:
@ 08:01 AM (6 months, 9 days ago)

Boy, just what ol' Huck has been hopin' for! And maybe why ol' Mitt only "suspended" his campaign?
 
Hmm...Senator McCain spends a lot of personal time, and *maybe* has affair with, Telecom industry lobbyist, while said senator is active in Telecom industry legislation.
 
Wellll, at least it's not a scandal about a homosexual affair...with an underage boy...and gerbils...and light bulbs.
 
His people are denying it of course. Maybe we ought to send McCain to Gitmo and waterboard him until the truth comes out.
 
This is a story from the NY Times about Sen. John McCain's ethics...his  possibly inappropriate relationship with a female lobbyist. The NYT had been chasing this story for months and were having internal dissension over whether to run the article. But rival publications (Newsweek, The New Republic and Politico) were hot on the trail and forced their hand.
 
Why was the NYT dragging its feet with this story? Surely not trying to atone for all those years of pimping the Bill and Monica story?
 
Or...are we not getting the news because 5 people own ALL the media?
 
From nytimes.com: "...In 1999 she began showing up so frequently in his offices and at campaign events that staff members took notice. One recalled asking, "Why is she always around?"
 
....A former campaign adviser described being instructed to keep Ms. Iseman away from the senator at public events, while a Senate aide recalled plans to limit Ms. Iseman's access to his offices.
 
In interviews, the two former associates said they joined in a series of confrontations with Mr. McCain, warning him that he was risking his campaign and career. Both said Mr. McCain acknowledged behaving inappropriately and pledged to keep his distance from Ms. Iseman. The two associates, who said they had become disillusioned with the senator, spoke independently of each other and provided details that were corroborated by others.
 
Separately, a top McCain aide met with Ms. Iseman at Union Station in Washington to ask her to stay away from the senator. John Weaver, a former top strategist and now an informal campaign adviser, said in an e-mail message that he arranged the meeting after "a discussion among the campaign leadership" about her.[..]"
 
http://tinyurl.com/ys69sj
 
Let's see...didn't Viagra come out around 1999?
 
Looks like the Times wouldn't stick its neck out so far if they didn't know a lot more about the story...at least on this first go round.
 
And if I am reading correctly, the key sources in this story are Republicans. Are they putting up a sex/corruption story now as a buffer zone against future stories that would be corruption only?
 
Seriously, if this was just about an 8 year old affair it wouldn't be much...but the fact that Iseman's clients had business before McCain's committee at the same time makes this story important.
 
Wow...could he literally go to bed with a lobbyist and then push her legislative goals?
 
How did McCain vote on the impeachment of Clinton, again?
 
As to the fall out, Hillary probably does not want to go there...we'll have to wait and see if Obama and Michelle find some way to take a few subtle digs at McCain.
 
There's long been blog rumors about a stifled NYT bimbo story concerning an unspecified candidate...some thought it was about Edwards.
 
And you know, it would be interesting to find out how many people knew about the existence of the NYT McCain story through blog activity...as opposed to how many would have known about it before blogs came along.
 
I'd bet the difference would be in the millions. Something to think about...