Sooner Be Blue

Mostly politics, a few current events, a squirt of seltzer down yer pants .. a little blog for my rambles and rants.

2008/6/25

Dobson is the fruitcake, not Obama

Tags:
@ 09:31 AM (13 days, 21 hours ago)

"By Krissah Williams, from washingtonpost.com...
James Dobson, a long-time leader of conservative Christians, today accused Sen. Barack Obama of "deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to justify his own world view."
 
Dobson's comments, which aired today on his Focus on the Family radio show, come as Obama's campaign plans to launch a broad appeal to evangelicals and Catholics.
Dobson and Tim Minnery, a senior vice president at Focus on the Family, spent about 20 minutes of the show harshly critiquing a speech that Obama gave in 2006 to a group of liberal Christian leaders.
 
In the speech, Obama argues for religious diversity and acceptance and prods liberals not to cede issues of faith to Republicans. [..]
 
http://tinyurl.com/4ee8yj
 
From Sen. Barack Obama's 'Call to Renewal' Keynote Address, 6/28/06....
"Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers."
 
"And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles."
 
http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060628-call_to_renewal/
 
Hmm...it takes big, brass ones to stand up and say those things as a politician...even if the people who disagree with you aren't the people you look to get votes from.
 
This Dobson loony can try to attack it all he wants, but anyone who is half-sane can see that this was a great speech.
 
Isn't Dobson the one who said kiddie cartoon character Sponge Bob Squarepants is gay?
 
Hey James, when The Rapture comes can I have your stuff?
 
Despite feeling that McCain isn't quite crazy enough in the right sorta fundie way -- after all, he did say "I cannot and I will not vote for John McCain" -- Dobson, on McCain's behalf, still launched a loony attempt to try to criticize Obama for "misreading" the Bible and the Constitution.
 
Not to worry...Dobson will fall on the same trash heap of history as Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggert, Ted Haggard, Jim Jones, Jerry Falwell, Jim Bakker, and all the rest of those phony saints who set themselves up as spokesmen for the Almighty.
 
An Almighty BTW who seems only concerned with tithing to the church, homosexuality, abortion, and gay marriage. Not like Jesus at all, who was concerned about loving each other, feeding the hungry, healing the sick, etc.
 

2008/6/17

Those sleazy bastards

Tags:
@ 07:06 AM (22 days, 17 minutes ago)

 

...are still sending lies about Sen. Obama through email.

From his website:

A recent email forward allegedly quotes passages from Senator Obama's
books related to race and religion. The majority of these are
alterations, deliberate manipulations, and in one case, an outright
fabrication, of Obama's words.

EMAIL
From Dreams of My Father: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive
sense of grievance and animosity against my mothers race.'

FULL QUOTE
Nothing close to this quote appears in Dreams from My Father

EMAIL
From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me
wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'

FULL QUOTE
"He offered to start me off at ten thousand dollars the first year,
with a two-thousand-dollar travel allowance to buy a car; the salary
would go up if things worked out. After he was gone, I took the long
way home, along the East River promenade, and tried to figure out what
to make of the man. He was smart, I decided. He seemed committed to
his work. Still, there was something about him that made me wary. A
little too sure of himself, maybe. And white--he'd said himself that
that was a problem." [Page 142]

EMAIL
From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men
whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the
black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought
in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'

FULL QUOTE
"All my life, I had carried a single image of my father, one that I
had sometimes rebelled against but had never questioned, one that I
had later tried to take as my own. The brilliant scholar, the generous
friend, the upstanding leader--my father had been all those things.
All those things and more, because except for that one brief visit in
Hawaii, he had never been present to foil the image, because I hadn't
seen what perhaps most men see at some point in their lives: their
father's body shrinking, their father's best hopes dashed, their
father's face lined with grief and regret.

Yes, I'd seen weakness in other men--Gramps and his disappointments,
Lolo and his compromise. But these men had become object lessons for
me, men I might love but never emulate, white men and brown men whose
fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black
man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in
myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela. And
if later I saw that the black men I knew--Frank or Ray or Will or
Rafiq--fell short of such lofty standards; if I had learned to respect
these men for the struggles they went through, recognizing them as my
own--my father's voice had nevertheless remained untainted, inspiring,
rebuking, granting or withholding approval. You do not work hard
enough, Barry. You must help in your people's struggle. Wake up, black
man!

Now, as I sat in the glow of a single light bulb, rocking slightly on
a hard-backed chair, that image had suddenly vanished. Replaced
by...what? A bitter drunk? An abusive husband? A defeated, lonely
bureaucrat? To think that all my life I had been wrestling with
nothing more than a ghost!" [Page 220]

EMAIL
From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the
political winds shift in an ugly direction.'

FULL QUOTE
"Whenever I appear before immigrant audiences, I can count on some
good-natured ribbing from my staff after my speech; according to them,
my remarks always follow a three-part structure: "I am your friend,"
"[Fill in the home country] has been a cradle of civilization," and
"You embody the American dream." They're right, my message is simple,
for what I've come to understand is that my mere presence before these
newly minted Americans serves notice that they matter, that they are
voters critical to my success and full-fledged citizens deserving of
respect.

Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow
this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and
Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the
stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from
neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have
been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a
dark underbelly; they need specific assurances that their citizenship
really means something, that America has learned the right lessons
from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will
stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly
direction." [Page 260-261]

Read More...

http://factcheck.barackobama.com/

 

2008/6/13

How long before Fox News uses the N word ...

Tags:
@ 07:36 AM (25 days, 23 hours ago)

Looks like Barack Obama isn't going to just sit back and be "swiftboated", ignore smears and think he's above it (like Kerry did).
 
The Obama campaign recently opened a website dedicated to debunking rightie smears, called "Fight the Smears"...at this site, you can not only find information that thoroughly debunks smears and false rumors, you can take action now and spread the truth to your friends, etc.
 
It covers lies like Michelle Obama using the word “whitey” from the pulpit of Trinity United, or whether Barack Obama is a Muslim and hiding his birth certificate, etc.
 
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearshome/
 
Good idea...but boy howdy the list of rightie smears is gonna be miles long, scrolling could be an issue. Maybe they should break it down into groups:
 
LimbaughSmears.com
HannitySmears.com
MalkinSmears.com
EDHillSmears.com
OReillySmears.com
 
Or categories;
 
1-- Foreign-sounding name
2-- Religious affiliation/soft on Muslims
3-- Speakers at his former church
4-- Campaign appointees
5-- Personal clothing accessories (flag pins, etc.)
6-- Wife's public remarks
7-- Wife's perfect wardrobe
8-- Ivy League elitist
9--Vegetable preferences (arugula, etc.)
10-- Secret love child
 
What really gets my goat is when Fox News does crap like this:
 
"June 12, 2008, 5:20 pm
Fox Forced to Address Michelle Obama Headline
 
For the third time in less than three weeks, Fox News Channel has had to acknowledge using poor judgment through inappropriate references to Senator Barack Obama.
 
The network has released a statement saying it should not have referred to Mr. Obama’s wife, Michelle, as “Obama’s Baby Mama,’’ as it did on Wednesday in an on-screen headline commonly called a “chyron.”.....
 
The chyron ...read in full, “Outraged Liberals: Stop picking on Obama’s baby mama!” ....
 
The Oxford English Dictionary defines the term as one “chiefly in African-American usage” that refers to, “The mother of a man’s child, who is not his wife nor (in most cases) his current or exclusive partner.”[..]"
 
http://tinyurl.com/4p7z3r
 
"What you won't hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon -- that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize. Because we may call ourselves Democrats and Republicans, but we are Americans first. We are always Americans first." -- Barack Obama, June 3, 2008
 
[inhales deeply] Smell that fresh air!
 

2008/6/4

It's almost over

Tags:
@ 07:46 AM (1 month, 4 days ago)
 
Hillary and Barack were neck and neck, one with more delegates, the other, more popular vote...but Barack Obama will win the Democratic nomination for president.
 
I got so sick of the 16 month long campaign -- yes, 16 months -- that I stopped watching and reading about it. What a mess. Who can blame anyone for wondering how the Democratic party can run a country if they can screw up a nominating process like that.
 
But--first time in eight tries (since the present primary and delegate system was established) that it didn't work all that well. Simply because the two candidates were all but neck-and-neck.
 
Maybe we should rethink voting by caucus and have all states vote by primary. Maybe the Iowa/NH stranglehold should be replaced by a rotating regional primaries. Maybe we should get rid of the delegate system. Maybe the party nominee should be the candidate who gets the most popular votes. And while I'm at it, maybe the electoral college should be abolished for the general election, and the winner should be the candidate receiving the most popular votes.
 
That off my chest, now we Democrats must turn our attention to the general election, and on beating John McCain.
 
And Obama still has to figure out exactly what to do with Hillary Clinton.
 
To have her on the ticket, or not to...that is the question.
 
At this point the best reason to have Clinton on the ticket is to keep a bulk of her supporters who have sworn to defect. The gain might not be worth it, when you take into account those supporters who would eventually vote for Obama anyway.
 
She has appeal within the party, but doesn’t do so well outside the party. If you're trying to appeal to disgusted Republicans and Independents ... there is a real possibility that Clinton will end up being a bigger drag on the ticket than an asset.
 
While it’s nice to think of a "dream ticket" as being unstoppable, it’s also double the baggage. Obama’s got enough baggage he’ll have to deal with on his own, and having Hillary as the VP would also result in bringing her baggage -- and Bill’s (someone give him a tranquilizer) -- along for the ride.
 
Even without any baggage, the Clintons could very easily upstage the top of the ticket...and that’s not good under any circumstances.
 
So I don’t know. At this point, I’ll live with just about anything I guess. It's time to unite together and work on beating McCain.
 
But whatever else happens from here on out, Barack Obama will  become the first African-American to win the nomination. He has changed the course of American history. He has now opened the door to other people -- other young African- Americans and people of other ethnicities who can say if he can do it, I can do it. And that's an historic moment.
 
The fact that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama now have legitimized the idea that no matter what your gender, no matter what your race, you can make it to the top of American politics. This alone is something to celebrate.
 
It's ironic that, when the Democratic convention is held on August 28 and Barack Obama accepts the nomination for president, 45 years ago on that actual date, a young man stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and gave his "I Have A Dream" speech. How I wish he could have lived to see this.
 
America with all her warts, her dark history concerning the rights of blacks and women, has indeed changed, is evolving, and still the best country in the world. As sick as we are of it, I think this whole Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton campaign has done a lot to help America's reputation around the world.
 
George W. Bush sometimes made me ashamed to be American...but the tide has, hopefully, turned. We should pat ourselves on the back as Americans, we are going to restore our reputation.
 
Now on to November...and the Reverend Wright commercials...and probably one hell of an October surprise...
 

2008/5/23

Get a grip, Senator

Tags:
@ 10:59 AM (1 month, 16 days ago)

Some Dems are saying that the easiest way to defeat John McCain this November is to make him mad.
 
We've all heard stories about McCain's cranky temper, and he sure showed where those stories came from yesterday when he got pissy after Obama had the nerve to disagree with him about Jim Webb's GI Bill extension.
 
From the Boston Globe, May 23, 2008:
"McCain misses vote on a new GI Bill, scorns criticism from Obama
Support for the troops returned as an issue to the presidential campaign yesterday with harsh words from both sides.
 
The Democratic National Committee accused John McCain of being AWOL from the Senate vote yesterday for a new GI Bill to provide better education benefits for returning veterans. McCain was in California on a campaign and fund-raising trip, while both Democratic contenders, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, left the campaign trail to vote for the bill, which passed by a veto-proof 75-to-22 majority.
 
On the Senate floor, Obama questioned why McCain opposed the bill. "I can't believe why he believes it is too generous to our veterans," Obama said. "There are many issues that lend themselves to partisan posturing, but giving our veterans the chance to go to college should not be one of them."
 
McCain, a Vietnam War hero, didn't take the criticism lightly - and while Obama is careful to honor McCain's military service, he mentioned Obama's lack of it.
 
"I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did," McCain said in a statement. "Perhaps, if Senator Obama would take the time and trouble to understand this issue he would learn to debate an honest disagreement respectfully. But, as he always does, he prefers impugning the motives of his opponent, and exploiting a thoughtful difference of opinion to advance his own ambitions. If that is how he would behave as president, the country would regret his election."[..]
 
http://tinyurl.com/5uok27
 
Obama then came back with:
From politico.com: "I am proud to stand with Senator Webb and a bipartisan coalition to give our veterans the support and opportunity they deserve. It's disappointing that Senator McCain and his campaign used this issue to launch yet another lengthy personal, political attack instead of debating an honest policy difference. He should know that this is not about John McCain or Barack Obama — it’s about giving our veterans a real chance to afford four years of college without harming retention. Senator Webb’s bipartisan bill will do this, and the bill that John McCain supports would not. These endless diatribes and schoolyard taunts from the McCain campaign do nothing to advance the debate about what matters to the American people."
 
http://tinyurl.com/4xlxhe
 
Now I ask you -- which candidate sounded Presidential? And which one sounded like a cranky old man?
 
McCain saying that if we are too generous it will deter troops from becoming "career" military, is just plain silly. If anyone in this country is deserving of generosity, it's the troops that are putting life and limb on the line every day.
 
Besides, if the deal is sweetened, wouldn't it draw more kids into the military?
 
McCain is probably just being honest about why he needs the kids to re-up instead of go to college -- we've got two wars going and need a larger military for all the wacky adventures he plans for his administration.